rationalskepticism.org

CharlieM wrote:

MrFungus420 wrote:

CharlieM wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Yes I do. Again, where are you drawing these conclusions from?

I get inspiration and guidance from peole who are far wiser than I am. You seem to think that the same entity cannot be called by different names in different cultures. Why would you think this?

Nowhere was that said or implied.

Are you having problems with reading comprehension or with being honest?

Well Thomas wrote, "God is called Jaweh of Jehovah, never one of the Hindu names."

Because it's true, he's never called by any of the names of other gods in the bible.
Only the Christian and Hebrew names.

CharlieM wrote:He seems to think that because Jehovah is not given a Hindu name in the Bible this is of some significance.

It is.
Why would one and the same god, give different names and identities to different peoples, thereby causing much strife and division, instead of just using one name and one set of rules?

CharlieM wrote:Can either of you tell me what then is the significance of this?

I've already repeatedly done this and did again just now.

CharlieM wrote:Why would anyone think that Jehovah should be given a Hindu name by the Hebrews?

Because it's the name of god.
My names is Thomas, both here, in India, Jerusalem, all over the world.