Posted: Feb 11, 2015 8:03 pm
by Shrunk
Thomas Eshuis wrote:He'd still need to demonstrate it's due to the gay agenda and not other influences.

Yes. And if he believes the change in policy was made 10 years ago (which is what he says, regardless of the fact that he's wrong) then it should be obvious to him that that could not be cause of a trend that had been going on long before.

He's a bald faced liar, IOW, shocking as that may be. :grin: