Posted: May 01, 2015 5:44 pm
by Free
dejuror wrote:
Free wrote:

This old myther trick from Kenneth Humphrey's has been conclusively refuted numerous times.

First of all, contrary to Humphrey's assertions, Philo was not some kind of "roving reporter" of historical events in Judea.

Secondly, Philo of Alexandria was called "Philo of ALEXANDRIA" because he lived in Alexandria, Egypt, and was no where near Jerusalem at the time.


Old HJers trick from "Free"!!!!!!!

What about Paul of Tarsus?

Tarsus was NO where near Jerusalem at that time.

Paul claimed he was a WITNESS that God raised Jesus from the dead.

God was NO WHERE at that time.

The dead is NO WHERE resurrected at ANY TIME.

The Pauline Corpus is just a pack of lies--historical garbage.


Yes yes yes ... we all understand what "you" are all about. We have seen enough to determine that every last argument you've presented is so off the wall and "out there" as to not be considered seriously.

But by all means, please carry on. At least you amuse us.

:popcorn: