Posted: May 01, 2015 10:28 pm
Free wrote:IanS wrote:Free wrote:IanS wrote:
Can you quote from any post of mine where I have ever said "Jesus is a total Myth"? Yes or no?
Where is the Quote please!
Please be absolutely certain to justify that claim of yours (and your demand), by quoting from any post of mine where I ever said that “Jesus was a total myth”?
The quote please; where is it!
Can you quote any post of mine where I said precisely "Jesus Christ absolutely 100% almost certainly probably existed?"
Find that exact quote, please.
Point is, finding an exact quote is not required, because the evidence of your leaning heavily into the mysticism camp is all over this thread, and to suggest otherwise is ludicrous.
All your arguments reek of the stench of Jesus Mythicism.
Well now you are doing the same thing again, and digging an even deeper hole for yourself by claiming that I have said something else about you, which I have never said at all ... where in any of my posts have I ever accused you of saying “precisely "Jesus Christ absolutely 100% almost certainly probably existed?" ... where did any post of mine ever accuse you of writing that??
OK, so now you need to provide quotes from any of my posts supporting both of those accusations from you -
1. Please be absolutely certain to justify that claim of yours (and your demand), by quoting from any post of mine where I ever said that “Jesus was a total myth”?
Where is that quote please? Make sure you post it this time!
And secondly -
2. Please be absolutely certain to justify that accusation of yours by quoting from any post of mine where I ever said you had written saying "Jesus Christ absolutely 100% almost certainly probably existed?"
Where is that quote please?
You really cannot keep making these accusations without ever providing the quotes when you are asked to. Please quote where my posts ever said either of the above 1 and 2.
Look ; I would say the same to you as I just asked of Stein - please stop the personalised abusive remarks that pepper all of your posts. And instead lets have a respectful constructive exchange of opinions about whether or not the bible can be safely regarded as a reliable and credible source of factual evidence to show that Jesus was a human person ever known to anyone at the time.
Because if he was not known to anyone who ever wrote about him, then it’s an unarguable fact that the most that any such biblical writers could ever produce was simply their un-evidenced hearsay beliefs of religious faith. And that is the problem with the bible. That is the problem with an anonymously written bible from authors who never knew Jesus, writing centuries later, to solemnly tell their readers that they knew this unknown figure of the past to be a supernatural scion of God, whose stories were confirmed to them by divine revelation and according to the ancient religious scriptures.
Thank you for conclusively demonstrating the point of the HJers that the JMers are left wanting in the reading comprehension department.
If you can't figure out that my point in my post above was to demonstrate how, yes I lean towards historicity, but no I didn't say that exact quote, then do you really think you should even be in this argument?
The point again is that you lean towards mythicism, and no exact quote is required for anyone to determine that fact. If you fail to understand this again, then you can sit in your false sense of haughtiness while the rest of us remain embarrassed for you.
Seriously dude ...
Right, so in fact you cannot back up any of those accusations of yours with any quotes of me saying any such thing at all.
Excellent.
Well that’s the clearest possible public demonstration of how completely inadequate you are when placed on the spot and asked to explain why you keep spewing out such a deliberate torrent of blatantly abusive personalised untruths about other members of this forum.