Posted: May 02, 2015 7:45 am
by Oldskeptic
dejuror wrote:
MS2 wrote:

(By the same token, it might be helpful if you didn't describe your position as the one held by 'the skeptics', as plenty of people who regard themselves as skeptical in general outlook happen to think the evidence points to an HJ. Perhaps you could say 'HJ-skeptics'?)


The "Plenty people" argument is complete useless when dealing with Atheists.

Atheists are a minority

You put forward the baseless absurd notion that 'plenty people' is better than evidence.

It is already known that there are BILLIONS of people who believe Jesus of Nazareth existed WITHOUT a shred of credible historical evidence.


Simply fucking amazing! How can you misunderstand one little paragraph so completely? It's not like there were a lot of big fancy words you'd have to look up.