rationalskepticism.org

Scot Dutchy wrote:

Evolving wrote:

jamest wrote:
I'm against the idea that God is against anything, since God has allowed everything.

That's a good point (if one accepts the premise of a god in the first place).

Need evidence to do that.

The point I originally made was clearly a reference to the mere supposition of God, as I was responding to Mick's post. IF a God exists, then one must wonder why numerous theists are complaining about anything being an affront to God, lest God be both judgemental and lame. Which in itself is an affront to the logical conception of 'God'.

If a God exists, then 'it' clearly doesn't give two shits about the choices 'we' make. If It did, then we would be incapable of making those choices, else that God is a lame duck.

Happy New Year.