Posted: Dec 17, 2016 4:50 am
It's really that bad, they just assert they see jesus without any kind of evidence to back up why what they see should be taken to be jesus? Any evidence, and any theories, etc, originating from true believers should be considered suspect, suspect enough to never be accepted without some pretty convincing corroborative support form non-believers. The gross biases that beliefs engender is so well established, this really shouldn't be controversial. I'm sure christian archeologists would think that about archeologists who were true believers in a different religion.