rationalskepticism.org

PensivePenny wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

John Platko wrote:

That's not the general assessment of the scholarly community.

Which is rather irrelevant, since facts aren't decided by popular vote and scholar is not a protected term.

I'm curious... are you a climate change denier too? Yours is essentially the same argument they use to discredit scientists.

Yet more personalised remarks, in lieu of actually adressing the point being raised.
Science is based on verifiable facts, not on how many people agree with a notion.
And scholar isnt a protected term, anyone and their senile grandmother can call themselves a scholar. Doesn't mean what they think about the topic carries any weight.