rationalskepticism.org

PensivePenny wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

PensivePenny wrote:Thomas, whatever "pretense" I choose, is my business

You're missing the point. I meant you won't get away with it.

Thomas, no. You're missing the point. Ranting isn't a means to gain respect or an audience receptive to your remarks.

Q.E.D. more baseless accusations and projecting of emotions.
I haven't ranted in the slighest and I'm not interested in a popularity contest. All I am interested in is a rational discussion on the topic of this thread.
Something which you consistently fail to accomodate, instead opting for increasingly personalised flaming while pretending to be the reasonable party.

I've repeatedly asked you to drop this peurile derail and to get back to an honest and rational discussion.
All you've responded with is personalised comments and lies about not engaging with me anymore and not being interested in what I am saying anymore.

There's basically three ways you can go from here Penny:
1. Continue with your disengenuous flaming, thereby damaging the very respect and receptiveness you're referring to. Not to mention possible moderator intervention.
2. Keep your to your earlier claim and ignore me. Which won't prevent me from pointing out the flaws and other issues in your posts.
3. Start having an honest, rational and impersonal discussion on the topic of this thread with me.