Posted: Apr 25, 2017 12:50 pm
PensivePenny wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:PensivePenny wrote:LOL...
Thomas, I don't engage in fights with children, the mentally challenged, drunks or people with an axe to grind (and others). I can keep this up all day if you need the typing practice, knock yourself out.
Still opting for peurile flaming, rather than an honest discussion, I see.
See? Flaming accusation. I never flamed you.
You've just demonstrated you either don't know what flaming means, or that you're lying about your contributions in this thread.
At multiple points, you've either insinuated or outright stated that I am:
- childish
- mentally ill/handicapped
- need to calm down
etc.
Those are all personalised comments that have nothing to with the actual arguments being made and everything to do with attacking my character or mental state.
That's flaming. And it contravenes the FUA.
PensivePenny wrote: I stated a fact about how I behave....
Except that you've repeatedly implied or outright stated that I'm mentally ill/handicapped and need to talk to a therapist.
Thereby not only refuting the claim that you don't discuss with such people, but demonstrably posting inflammatory comments.
PensivePenny wrote: I don't engage many types of people. I listed some.
In response to a post of mine wherein I pointed out that you repeatedly try to imply or outright accuse me of being one of those type of people.
Your previous post don't magically disappear Penny. Their context, as well as that of my own posts, remains in this thread for anyone to see.
PensivePenny wrote: Frankly, I don't know what category you might fit in.
Not only do you have no basis whatsoever to make such a judgement, to do so, would be yet another personalised remark.
PensivePenny wrote: One I listed or one of the (and others). I don't care.
Another demonstrable lie in light of the repeated insinuations and accusations you've made about/to me in this thread,
PensivePenny wrote: I've just identified that this constant misinterpretation of one anothers posts would likely never be resolved.
That's baseless cop-out. I've repeatedly tried to get you to drop your personalised derail and discuss the thread's topic.
Misunderstandings are solved by honest and rational discussion, not dismissing other people out of hand.
PensivePenny wrote:I've responded to you politely for the most part.
More counterfactual bollocks.
PensivePenny wrote: I have indicated I have no intention nor desire to engage you, yet you persist.
It takes two people to engage Penny.
All you have to do is keep to your repeated and false assertions that you've not intention to engage with me, by no longer responding to my posts.
Like I said before, this won't stop me from responding to yours, but you'll no longer be engaging with me.
The fact that you keep coming back and most often only to post personalised invective, makes me doubt your assertions of disinterest and willingness to ignore me.
PensivePenny wrote: In doing so, you indicate you have no respect for my desire. I don't need to justify my feelings.
You're in no position to talk about respect.
You've repeatedly tried to paint me with all manner of negative character traits and nefarious motivations.