Posted: Apr 25, 2017 2:15 pm
Sendraks wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Since no-one has expressed being worked up in any sense, in this thread, this is yet another non-sequitur.
No, it is simply another unhealthy manifestation of projecting emotions onto others that Penny should stop, as indeed should anyone engaged in this behaviour. Of course, I'm being generous here and entertaining the notion that in Penny's case, such projection is being done in all innocence.
So was I, hence why I catagorised it as a non-sequitur and not an intentional misrepresentation.
Sendraks wrote:There are certainly individuals who will engage in this behaviour in a dishonest effort to undermine the arguments of others by making spurious claims about the emotions of their interlocutors. It is a classic way of denying people agency.
