Posted: Apr 25, 2017 4:35 pm
Thomas Eshuis wrote:Could you then answer my question or link to the post where you think you answered it?
Why do you think the 4 or 5 mentions of the OT still being valid, in the bible, is not a lot?
I probably didn't answer it because it is irrelevant. "A lot" is as relative term. Did you think it was meant to be a scientific claim? I just expected there would have been more. That's all.
Why, what did you read into it?