Posted: Jun 10, 2017 12:15 am
Leucius Charinus wrote:
My position is that I have cited the translators' opinions that the reference is an interpolation ("margin gloss foisted upon text") from their respective translations and footnotes.
You've not merely cited them: you've cited them with approval, including the claim that the text is ungrammatical. I've merely pointed out that you've yet to defend this position which you've endorsed, likely because you're unable to do so. Correct me if I'm mistaken.