Posted: Sep 29, 2017 10:37 am
Zadocfish2 wrote:Cito di Pense wrote:Zadocfish2 wrote:So you're saying it works now? Victory at last!
Of course it works. For you. Blub blub blub. For a more nuanced view, see rocket science.
I don't claim to have shown you something that works better. But I defy you to show me that the I Ching or Ouija board does not work just as well. You now are charged with debunking the I Ching and the Ouija board. Or not, but that means you have nothing to sell me and you might want to shut the fuck up about biblical coincidences.
You realize, of course, that accepting that one event might be supernatural is inherently tied to the idea that supernatural events might be possible. Kind of an odd point you're making; I never said that other methods don't have results, because that would go against my point of the supernatural existing in the first place. You're making a strawman argument.
(for me) It's still not enough to say that supernatural events might be possible. How might they be possible? I don't need them. You (apparently) do, which is why you're content with saying they might be possible. If you're trying to sell me something, no sale. Whether or not supernatural events are possible, I don't say they are. This is about what I don't say, and what you do.