Posted: May 21, 2019 12:56 pm
RE: Tim O'Neill
RE: OP
Carrier and Freeman are both critical of the role the Christian church played in the middle ages.
At that same post he slams Carrier claim, basically the same claim as Charles Freeman, by saying that:
He defends the integrity of the middle ages church. He is an apologist for the church.
His posts and blogs are riddled with an uncritical use of ecclesiastical sources.
Does he defend the integrity of the TF?
lpetrich wrote:Leucius Charinus wrote:
His home base is at James Hannan's Forum.
http://jameshannam.proboards.com/board/2/christianity
Hannam is a Catholic apologist.
In Scrutinizing Richard Carrier | The Quodlibeta Forum he slams Richard Carrier for believing in the "conflict thesis" (between science and religion), that Adolf Hitler had been a Xian, and the like.
RE: OP
Carrier and Freeman are both critical of the role the Christian church played in the middle ages.
At that same post he slams Carrier claim, basically the same claim as Charles Freeman, by saying that:
- "he [Carrier] claims Christianity stultified ancient learning rather preserving it,
that there was minimal technological progress in the Middle Ages."
He defends the integrity of the middle ages church. He is an apologist for the church.
His posts and blogs are riddled with an uncritical use of ecclesiastical sources.
Does he defend the integrity of the TF?