Posted: Mar 12, 2020 10:15 pm
by Thomas Eshuis
Nevets wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Nevets wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Since you've failed to provide evidence for just about any of your vacuous claims, I won't hold my breath. :coffee:

Just take a look at the picture.
Dont be frightened

Now, when you open the link, it will show you, that the anglo-saxon raids, were conducted by Denmark.

If you accept, that they were conducted by Denmark, it means i win the debate.

On the otherhand, if you fail to acknowledge that fact, and pretend you did not see it, it means i also win the debate, but you carry on in delusion

Which is it to be?

Your picture does not refute anything I've said.
There was no Denmark at the time, just like there was no Germany or England.

There might have been no Germany.

No, there definitely wasn't. :naughty:

Nevets wrote:
But there certainly was a sea fairing people in Denmark and Norway, dating back to between 300 and 400BC, that were using Viking vessels

Which is not the same as Denmark, which did not exist at the time. Nor were they Vikings.
There were also people living in what we now call Russia at that time, but we don't call them Russians, or 'from Russia'.

Nevets wrote:
Whether the Norse people referred to themselves as Norse, or Danish, during 400bc, i could not really care.

No, you've made it abundantly clear that you don't care about reality or the facts.
The Angle-Saxons were not Norse and Gaelic predates the Norse invasion of England by centuries.

Nevets wrote:
Equally, i could not care about the fact, at 400BC, those boats were referred to as Hjortspring, and not Viking.

Since it is nothing but yet another disingenuous part of your gish-gallop, it matters fuck all. :roll:

Nevets wrote:
Language evolves.

But there is no link between Welsh and Norse and the word Prydain predates Norse existence in England.

Nevets wrote:
But seems like the foundations of the British Royal Navy went back to 400BC

More irrelevant bullshit. :coffee: