Posted: Mar 14, 2020 11:30 pm
by Nevets
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Since this one big fat lie, a product purely from your rectum, the rest of your post is completely pointless. :naughty:


No, it is not a big fat lie.
I did not name you in person.

But

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/relig ... l#p2737395
Thomas Eshuis wrote:There's only one mention of 3500 in that part and as I already pointed out to you it refers to Greek written sources not the existence of I-E in Greece.


In response to my belief in Thor, even though i explained, my use of Thor, is purely metaphorical for Germanic and Aryan and Indo-european language, you argued against every thing, until eventually making a statement that implied, Greek language only being recorded up to 1500BC is not proof that there was no Greek language before then, as it was passed down orally.
And this was an attempt to remove the academic knowledge that Greek language is a sub-branch of Indo-european

Now i am being asked to provide citation for you? This was not my claim.


Thomas Eshuis wrote:

They establish that Greek WRITTEN sources, no I-E language, go back 3500 years.
Do you not understand Nevets? :naughty:


Yes, i understand Thomas.
But, i would imagine an oral tradition to have no major role in the overall role of global language evolution, enough to debunk the Academic belief that Indo-European was the Proto tongue of Greek.
And i certainly do not accept folklore, legend, or myth, as Academic fact.
That is exactly what you brought to the table on the Thor thread, when you attempted to debunk the Academic claim, using unfounded Mythology.