Posted: Apr 04, 2022 7:47 pm
by Stein
dogsgod wrote:
Stein wrote:
proudfootz wrote:
RealityRules wrote:
    bullshit


This is the standard 'atheists are angry at God' nonsense we hear from fundamentalists all the time. :roll:


    bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, uses methodology for more bullshit, bullshit, bullshit

    The rest of your commentary is eccentric red herrings ie. essentially more bullshit


Ironically, Law's paper does talk about how to separate fact from fiction, but the author of Stein's blog!


CORRECTION: This is NOT my blog; this comes from the blog of

T I M
O ' N E I L L !!!

Duh,

Stein
It's one thing to acknowledge various theories including all the historical Jesus theories as well as the theories that may or may not necessarily include an historical Jesus, but believing a particular theory to be true and running with it is a fools errand. Believers claim to have the truth, you and O'neill are believers


TIM O'NEILL IS AN

A T H E I S T ,

OF WHICH I BELIEVE

Y O U

ARE

W E L L

A W A R E.

This counts as willful misrepresentation of a fellow member of this board, which is an infraction of this forum's rules -- AND YOU VERY WELL KNOW THAT.

Stein