Posted: Apr 04, 2022 10:21 pm
Stein wrote:dogsgod wrote:It's one thing to acknowledge various theories including all the historical Jesus theories as well as the theories that may or may not necessarily include an historical Jesus, but believing a particular theory to be true and running with it is a fools errand. Believers claim to have the truth, you and O'neill are believersStein wrote:proudfootz wrote:
This is the standard 'atheists are angry at God' nonsense we hear from fundamentalists all the time.
Ironically, Law's paper does talk about how to separate fact from fiction, but the author of Stein's blog!
CORRECTION: This is NOT my blog; this comes from the blog of
T I M
O ' N E I L L !!!
Duh,
Stein
TIM O'NEILL IS AN
A T H E I S T ,
OF WHICH I BELIEVE
Y O U
ARE
W E L L
A W A R E.
This counts as willful misrepresentation of a fellow member of this board, which is an infraction of this forum's rules -- AND YOU VERY WELL KNOW THAT.
Stein
This thread is not about atheism. Atheists can believe all manner of nonsense, just not in God, so your point is moot, off topic, and disruptive.
Trolls are those that haven't read the book that this thread is about but choose to be disruptive because they presume it to go against their firmly held beliefs.