Posted: Feb 27, 2010 2:59 pm
by alienpresence
TimONeill wrote:
alienpresence wrote:All written 'religio-historic sources' from such a distant depth in time must be considered suspect.

Anyone with anything more than a high school morons's grasp of the historical method knows that any source has to be considered "suspect" and handled appropriately. This is basic stuff. Can we please stop cluttering this thread up with this infantile crap.

I guess that means we've got no bones in this case?