Posted: Jan 30, 2011 1:48 pm
It always amuses me how they always Acknowledge 1 hit and ignore all the misses.
I mean... Doesnt it prove more so that there is no god evidently with all of those misses?
This way of thinking always falls flat on its face with the counter argument taking into account all of the misses as evidence for the opposite conclusion.
I mean... Doesnt it prove more so that there is no god evidently with all of those misses?
This way of thinking always falls flat on its face with the counter argument taking into account all of the misses as evidence for the opposite conclusion.