Posted: Apr 08, 2011 5:48 am
Okay, I accept that he misuses science - but I wouldn't say his (stupid) proof is reliant on that. You could take the scientific stuff out and you would still have a (stupid) proof there.
Lifeboat for the rational mind :D
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?p=796152#p796152