Posted: Apr 08, 2011 7:16 am
So Kalamity's so-called scientific arguments consist of misinterpreting the bing bang model and making assertions from personal incredulity?Teuton wrote:So Craig's "scientific" arguments for KCA are:
1. The big bang model predicts an absolute beginning of spacetime and is correct.
2. All alternative cosmological models lacking an absolute beginning of spacetime (cyclical/oscillating, baby or bubble universes/multiverses) are unworkable, not viable, or even physically impossible because inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics.
