Posted: Apr 08, 2011 9:32 am
Teuton wrote:Teuton wrote:
So Craig's "scientific" arguments for KCA are:
1. The big bang model predicts an absolute beginning of spacetime and is correct.
2. All alternative cosmological models lacking an absolute beginning of spacetime (cyclical/oscillating, baby or bubble universes/multiverses) are unworkable, not viable, or even physically impossible because inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics.
Did the physicist Lawrence Krauss attack these arguments in his recent debate with Craig? (I hope he did.)
He certainly did; he explains how Craig is misrepresenting both Guth and Hawking about a minute and a half into this bit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NFVgflLp1Q
If you can bear to keep watching, you can also see how Craig starts misrepresenting Krauss himself there and then!