Posted: Apr 09, 2011 2:11 pm
Matt_B wrote:
He certainly did; he explains how Craig is misrepresenting both Guth and Hawking about a minute and a half into this bit:
Krauss misleadingly claims that physicists have shown how it is possible for something to come from nothing. But what they have shown at best is how something can come from almost or virtually nothing; and nothing much is still something!