Posted: Sep 04, 2011 10:13 pm
by Ichthus77
Will, earlier you said "Not coincidence if they were written by humans and based off of one another"--what was your point in saying that, if you do not think the detail-filling was intentional? In the reply to which you are referring, you are going off on tangents I am attempting to avoid. It 'is' coincidence (I'm not suggesting or denying anything 'supernatural' here) when one source unintentionally (in other words, without 'faking it') fills in a missing detail for another source.