Posted: Nov 30, 2012 11:57 pm
A simple 'yes, I am' would have sufficed.Shantanu wrote:Doubtdispelled wrote:Shantanu wrote:she could get herself a decent job selling the rest of her body and mind but not her vagina if she is not so inclined
Gee, I'm glad you mentioned mind there. I was getting quite worried that you were obsessed with bodies and vaginas.
Tell me, are you the same Shantanu I read about a while back who thinks that no-one should have a go at Jimmy Savile because he is dead, and because what he did was considered to be more 'the norm' in that era?
What I did say was that all the individual allegations against Jimmy Saville should be examined in a Public Enquiry headed by a Judge who would take explicit details under cross examination from those who are now alleging that they were victims of his sexual predation crimes and other bystanders who were witnesses to the said offences under the prevailing law of the day.
Shantanu wrote:Do you disagree with this, preferring to 'have a go' at labeling Jimmy Savile guilty on heresay information?
Yes, I disagree with it, but not just on hearsay. I think the reactions of his immediate surviving family members are enough for most people. You know, those who took money from him in return for keeping their mouths shut? The ones who had his monument taken down, broken up, and taken to a tip before an outraged public could do so? The ones who are or have been talking about removing his body from its resting place to prevent desecration?
Yeah, they are the ones I prefer to listen to.