Posted: Oct 08, 2016 7:26 am
Anyone, except OP, actually read the comments which gave OP the idea that large number of people were angry? I will answer myself using my psychic power, with probability close to certainty .. nobody.
Now, first and second comment, out of 150, are:
My thesis:
Two fucking idiot, Me first!, trolls.
Then others, like in this thread, join and some are apparently under impression that they are debating issue/are being concerned with problem.
followed by couple more comments in similar fashion "debate" *coughs* naturally takes off.
Dont click it if you dont care ..
Misogynists!
Discrimination!
PhD in sociology: Honestly, even women aren't interested in women's football.
PhD in philosophy: The sports of the lumpen proletariat - women's football and darts.
Auditor: Wayne Rooney gets £300,000 a week for sitting on the bench ..
Backseat coach: Maybe it's because I'm a Southend fan so I'm used to bad quality football ..
Annoyed by SJW: Bbc coverage massively sexist towards men: they've been hijacked these last few years..
Lt. Data annoyed by SJW: Of the leading 18 articles on the BBC Sport front page, this is the only one about women's sport (another is the marriage of 2 Olympic champions) ..
Actual football fan: I really don't care what your agenda is - want to talk about the game today? It was very good. I thought Chelsea were under par but think City would have won whatever - a class apart!
Got the idea? All in all cool stories. Attacking women? Large number of people amounts to about 20, if deleted post are counted in.
Now, first and second comment, out of 150, are:
1. Posted by Sonmi_451 on
25 Sept 2016 16:24
Please don't force women's football down our throats. Not interested.
2. Posted by SpecialK on
25 Sept 2016 16:25
I'm not the slightest bit interested in women's football.
My thesis:
Two fucking idiot, Me first!, trolls.
Then others, like in this thread, join and some are apparently under impression that they are debating issue/are being concerned with problem.
8. Posted by Barnaby Lindsey-Wilbur on
25 Sept 2016 16:32
Are you going to put this much effort into reporting on non-league matches? because that's about the standard of women's football
Typical of the BBC to waste public money on this rubbish
followed by couple more comments in similar fashion "debate" *coughs* naturally takes off.
Dont click it if you dont care ..
Misogynists!
Discrimination!
PhD in sociology: Honestly, even women aren't interested in women's football.
PhD in philosophy: The sports of the lumpen proletariat - women's football and darts.
Auditor: Wayne Rooney gets £300,000 a week for sitting on the bench ..
Backseat coach: Maybe it's because I'm a Southend fan so I'm used to bad quality football ..
Annoyed by SJW: Bbc coverage massively sexist towards men: they've been hijacked these last few years..
Lt. Data annoyed by SJW: Of the leading 18 articles on the BBC Sport front page, this is the only one about women's sport (another is the marriage of 2 Olympic champions) ..
Actual football fan: I really don't care what your agenda is - want to talk about the game today? It was very good. I thought Chelsea were under par but think City would have won whatever - a class apart!
Got the idea? All in all cool stories. Attacking women? Large number of people amounts to about 20, if deleted post are counted in.