Posted: Dec 15, 2016 5:20 pm
by The_Metatron
Fallible wrote:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
The_Metatron wrote:
Fallible wrote:
The_Metatron wrote:Empathy guides, it prevents nothing, Thomas.

Speaking of empathy, tortured naked girls. They don't rate any?

I'm miles behind here, but in case anybody still cares, you've introduced the idea the girl has been tortured. You said nothing of how she came to be burned originally. You're embellishing.

You seem to know much more than I about sadism.

Do I? And where did you pull this latest piece of irrelevant nonsense from exactly?

Here I was thinking it was about someone taking pleasure from someone else's pain.

You were talking about someone taking pleasure from someone else's pain caused by torture. But you added that part later, which is what I just said.

Are you, and Rachel apparently, telling us that the method of inflicting that pain matters?

Obviously you are, or why would you have added torture to your story?

No, I'm telling YOU, singular, that you just shifted the goal posts from your original comment, which in turn you made off the back of the discussion about the Vietnam photo. Torture did not feature in the discussion which led to your comment, and it didn't feature as a part of your desire to murder someone until you introduced it a few pages ago. I really wish you'd stop posting emotionally about this topic, because you're just blindly lashing out quite aggressively at people, and jumping to some quite strange conclusions. No, I don't expect you to respond positively to that wish. I still wish it though.

Well, the likelihood of a sadistic pedophile existing that has the resources and ability to prosecute an entire war just to drop napalm on nine year old girls seems a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

On the other hand, we do know of instances of sadistic pedophiles who actually did torture girls.

Bring it home. Go have a look at some of the shit Marc Dutroux did. To your little girl. Then tell us how you wouldn't pinch his neck shut if you had the chance.