Posted: Dec 15, 2016 6:43 pm
The_Metatron wrote:Rachel Bronwyn wrote:Torture has a pretty distinct definition. I don't think the south Vietnam air force's napalm attacks on occupied territories fit it. Like, at all. They're assaults and acts of war. I'm sure the pain of the burns was torturous. No one was torturing her (by which I mean Napalm Girl) though. There are no tortured girls in this scenario. There is a girl who was collateral damage in a war she had no responsibility in.
Even if seeing a little girl suffering from severe burns gets you hard, I won't kill you for it.
Well then, that really narrows things down, eh?
Do you imagine that it matters the mechanism by which the girl loses the skin from her back for the sexual gratification of some imaginary sadistic pedophile?
You're begging the question that anyone experiencing sexual pleasure from that image does so because they associate it with inflicting pain.