Posted: Jan 09, 2017 8:39 pm
by tuco
Keep It Real wrote:2. Throwawayaccount and epepke. In one case the anonymity of the internet showed truth, in the other case imprisonment for his crimes. Sure, a paedophile seeking to live in society might well say they find paedophilic acts morally repugnant (they have to) but secretly they think they are all well and good.

Lets assume this is real situation. What is wrong with them to think they are all well and good, as long .. as they do no harm? This is important, they do not harm.

We've debated this before, with Shrunk for example, that we can imagine that CGI, in some distant future, will be able to satisfy some pedophiles up to the point that they would pose minimal threat to society. They would feel good, society would also feel good and CGI do not care. What is wrong with this?