Posted: Dec 20, 2010 1:54 am
Exactly what was the process for assessing how sociopathic someone was? And, to avoid researcher bias, how were those who did the assessing prevented from having any other information about the subjects?
A nifty follow-up, presuming the methods are valid, would be to apply them to describe the distribution of sociopathy across a wider spectrum of incomes and job positions. I'd suspect that, even given a peak among upper-level executives, there's also a second peak near the bottom.
A nifty follow-up, presuming the methods are valid, would be to apply them to describe the distribution of sociopathy across a wider spectrum of incomes and job positions. I'd suspect that, even given a peak among upper-level executives, there's also a second peak near the bottom.