Posted: Sep 18, 2011 11:01 am
advaitya wrote:Hindu anger?
How's that deduced knowing that Hindus' don't have an institutionalised clergy for articulating the religion's views. Swamis of temples don't have the authority like the church or ulemas of islam. Is it done by interviewing a few "spiritual leaders" who will always find a reason to be outraged and then publicise their personal opinion as the religions' ?
well, could you be clear then to tell us as to when exactly should we characterize something as being hindu?. Does someone being a hindu and claiming to speak on behalf of it not be enough to characterize so, atleast preliminarily?