Posted: Sep 20, 2011 9:24 pm
advaitya wrote:Where and whom am I protecting?
Hinduism as a whole.
If the rules of language were followed the title would read, "a few hindu men angry". There's no such thing as hindu anger, an inanimate ideology/religion/concept cannot be angry. It's a vague concept invented to impose guilt on a community for the acts of a few. It is, let me use that word, irrational.
No. The other interpretation of the title is perfectly rational and acceptable. You've chosen one interpretation. It gives you something to be pissed off at. Big deal.