Posted: Jul 15, 2019 2:42 pm
by Sendraks
Sofista wrote:The problem with that is that what we can measure is still limited to our level of technology.

Doesn't this strike you as fundamentally dishonest? After all you can keep pleading about limits to our level of technology....forever.

It would be a little more honest to set a timeframe, say about 100 years from now, as to when our technology will resolve the matter one way or the other. Its only a little more honest because, its not as if you'll be around to be called to account for your (failed) prediction.