Posted: Mar 13, 2020 8:26 am
Nevets wrote:theropod_V_2.0 wrote:Now if someone actually gave a shit. Not about the topic, but rather your spin. Believe it or not there are actual historical resources out there, and those don’t exist on Wiki. Frankly, i would fail a high school history paper for including one such wiki citation.
RS
Well, if you wish to begin your argument by citing "source" as your issue, then Cite your own source to show how my source is incorrect.
Your source isn't incorrect. It's that it rarely, if ever, supports your ludicrous claims.
More-over the burden of proof lies with you, not Theropod.
Nevets wrote:If you do, i may then search for another source, and better source.
No, it is entirely your responsibility to produce the best possible sources for the claims you make. Regardless of what your interlocutor does.
Nevets wrote:
But until such times as you do, or you debunk what has already been written, i simply do not have to.
Not legally, no. But rationally and honestly, most definitely.
