Posted: Jul 15, 2015 11:30 am
by Spearthrower
Peter Brown wrote:
Sendraks wrote:
Spearthrower wrote: It doesn't matter what the percentage cited is, though, as Peter has to ignore it to keep on the schtick that all Muslims are guilty for the actions of a tiny fraction of Muslims.

Or, if pressed, no-true-scotsman all those muslims who aren't part of that tiny fraction.

here we go again, the book say a fix statement, and you say its a no true scotsman

No wonder I think these views are bollocks

The book says a statement which different people interpret differently. This is factually establishable. It's happened throughout recorded history. It's directly observable today. Why do you pretend otherwise?