Posted: Sep 20, 2015 6:33 pm
by igorfrankensteen
I can't see the original posted link. I gues because I'm not loyal to the Crown. But I found another take on the story here:

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-33436021

which suggests that none of this fussing is applicable. According to the above link, the age of the parchment is still within the expected time that the Koran was said to have been written, and isn't old enough to be sure that it IS older than a lot of other very old copies in existing collections.