rationalskepticism.org

quas wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

quas wrote:
I feel the logic is tenous there.

There's that word again.

What should I have said? Ethereal?

Well, it implies the following claim is coherent or singular - that it is the reasoned result of the facts. All too often, I see it being used to legitimize claims possessing none of these qualities. Essentially, it appears to be used where the notion of 'opinion' would be more suitable.