rationalskepticism.org

Nevets wrote:"think", i "think" it says?

Yes, I realize I might be assuming a little too much comprehension, but your argument was:

Of course, Clovis had no allegiences to the Holy Roman Empire

Which Sendraks then pointed out that the Holy Roman Empire didn't even exist then.

And you replied:

Nevets wrote:I am going to give you a minute or two to prepair for this. But i have "the" Ace card....Will be revealed in next 60 seconds

Which aside from being pompous is also depressingly lacking in self-awareness, but then the comical element was reinforced when you went on to cite this:

Nevets wrote:
Royal Flush

Clovis I, king of the Franks, was the first important barbarian ruler to convert to Catholicism rather than Arianism, allying himself with the papacy.(55) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope#Nica ... %80%931054)

Which quite literally has fuck all to do with anything.

The Pope, of course, is not the Holy Roman Empire.

An alliance, of course, not being allegiance.

Clovis converted to Catholicism and had an alliance with the Pope. The Holy Roman Empire didn't come into existence for nearly 300 years after Clovis' death.