Posted: Mar 19, 2010 9:11 pm
by Sphynxcat
Aurlito wrote:During alphabet transition, few words have changed. so what? it didn't the whole perspective en masse. Islam was very popular by the time that Mohammad kicked it. and revelation was over so it was spread over in whole Muslim world as soon as his death. and that guy, "Abu-Baker" burnt all the alternative versions that other tribes of Arabia had. for bible change was inevitable because it became pluralized after nearly 3 centuries. but soon after Mohammad's death Iran and lands that today we call Syria and Iraq were submitted to Khalifa. changing Quran was impossible.


But if it was only a few words that had been changed, but not the whole perspective, then why should Abu Bakr feel the need to destroy the other versions if the disgressions in those korans other than the one he had settled upon were little more than cosmetic? Seems like overkill to me, if that was the case.