Posted: Oct 29, 2010 11:42 pm
by z8000783
Calilasseia wrote:
starr wrote:
z8000783 wrote:
Do it however you like mate, it'll be great whatever approach is taken just so long as you sack all these winging moderators.

John


I think I'm the only moderator with wings.... :waah: :whine: :whine: :whine:

:lol:


You forgot me. :)

God they're like buses, another one along in a minute. More moaning with page after page after page of -

Calilasseia wrote:This is so simple even a pre-agitated rectally dysfunctional toad could follow this argument. Which bit of Vasoreactivity in postischemic epicardial macrovessels was studied as described previously (40). Briefly, LAD and LCX coronary artery segments were cut into 3-mm segments and hung in organ chambers containing oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer at 37°C. After 60 min of stabilization, the coronary artery rings were preconstricted with the thromboxane A2 mimetic U-46619. Endothelial function was assessed by quantifying the vasorelaxation responses to incremental concentrations of endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine, whereas smooth muscle function was assessed with incremental concentrations of the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside. Vascular responses were monitored using a videographics program (Spectrum; Winston-Salem, NC) do you not understand.

Errr.....how long have you got exactly?

Who's next?

John