Posted: Apr 05, 2010 6:51 am
Well other than atheism just being a claim about God, my anarchism wouldn't support usury as it feels like one group with capital ruling others without capital. It sounds like there is insufficient competition in the supply of capital.
Given capital is money and money is a liquid instrument that is trusted then we (the concerned 3rd parties) either increase liquidity and so compete or we or the victims go to the source of the trust and attack that (i.e. we ask the government to legislate or manage liquidity in this area).
If we are all are in a un-elected country then we have more problems than usury and as we cannot increase liquidity or ask the government to legislate or manage liquidity in this area then we must replace that government with one that will.
Sorted.
Given capital is money and money is a liquid instrument that is trusted then we (the concerned 3rd parties) either increase liquidity and so compete or we or the victims go to the source of the trust and attack that (i.e. we ask the government to legislate or manage liquidity in this area).
If we are all are in a un-elected country then we have more problems than usury and as we cannot increase liquidity or ask the government to legislate or manage liquidity in this area then we must replace that government with one that will.
Sorted.