Posted: Feb 26, 2017 2:38 pm
It's very hard to reply, because almost every particular inference in the opening post is invalid.
One important thing to notice is that if you assume from the outset that Hell is a real place, then any reference to Pascal's wager is entirely redundant, you don't need to make a probabilistic gamble on the truth of something you've already stated to be true. The whole point of the wager is how to hedge your bets if you can't make your mind up (and it's a faulty piece of reasoning, for reasons which aren't even touched on in the OP).
One important thing to notice is that if you assume from the outset that Hell is a real place, then any reference to Pascal's wager is entirely redundant, you don't need to make a probabilistic gamble on the truth of something you've already stated to be true. The whole point of the wager is how to hedge your bets if you can't make your mind up (and it's a faulty piece of reasoning, for reasons which aren't even touched on in the OP).