Posted: Oct 04, 2018 6:53 pm
Wortfish wrote:BlackBart wrote:Yeah, seriously Wortfish, up your game mate. That was really pathetic. We need something a little less hackneyed and desperate to chew on.
Atheists like to say to theists: "You are an atheist in that you don't believe in all but one of a number of possible gods".
Theists like to say to atheists: "You cannot claim to be an atheist if you treat existence as anything other than meaningless and purposeless which is what a possible universe without a god would be like."
Now which of those statements is the more rational and logical?
The first one. It's the first one you're insinuating towards, right?
What do I win?
ETA: This train of thought did lead me to this hilariously inept disanalogical takedown of the meme:
https://strangenotions.com/debunking-th ... objection/
Suppose someone skeptical about Euclidean geometry said:
"When you understand why you regard all the particular triangles you’ve observed as having sides that are less than perfectly straight, you will understand why I regard Euclidean plane triangles as such to have sides that are less than perfectly straight."
