Posted: Dec 21, 2018 3:02 pm
[I just discovered that I can't correct the OP's first sentence as I intended.]
Now, I will change the sentence which led to the wrong interpretation: I don't mean that ANY propositions or subjects are worthy of "labor in consideration." The new sentence: "...any and all the subjects worthy of the time and for which, "I don't know," is the conclusion." I did qualify in the third sentence with, "the several ultimate questions". If you don't have the time to get to the third sentence, then I suggest that you NOT read my posts.
Are you a wretched Atheist? There are types of Atheist.
SafeAsMilk wrote:scherado wrote:Any self-respecting Agnostic labors in consideration of any and all the subjects for which, "I don't know," is the conclusion.
No agnostic without too much time on their hands labors in consideration about the existence of Bigfoot, or how many angels fit on the head of a pin. Some folks have actual, legitimate concerns to occupy their intellectual energies. By your measure, I could make up literally anything and keep making up things about it, and you'd have to labor in consideration of it. ...
Now, I will change the sentence which led to the wrong interpretation: I don't mean that ANY propositions or subjects are worthy of "labor in consideration." The new sentence: "...any and all the subjects worthy of the time and for which, "I don't know," is the conclusion." I did qualify in the third sentence with, "the several ultimate questions". If you don't have the time to get to the third sentence, then I suggest that you NOT read my posts.
Are you a wretched Atheist? There are types of Atheist.