Posted: Dec 24, 2018 8:56 am
OlivierK wrote:So, Destroyer, let me see if I've got this right. You're saying that...
1) There are phenomena for which we have, as yet, no coherent explanation
2) You have an incoherent explanation
3) Therefore, your incoherent explanation must be correct.
Am I close?
No. Absurdity, having factual support means that it can be logically and coherently accounted for.
It is this complete account that I have only ever been willing to disclose in PM.