Posted: Mar 14, 2020 2:51 am
SafeAsMilk wrote:jamest wrote:SafeAsMilk wrote:jamest wrote:I feel justified in labelling that Being 'God' as - if I'm right, which I'm sure that I am -
How are you so sure? You don't think much of evidence and you can't claim to have a convincing argument for it, since in 20 years of making the argument you haven't managed to convinced anyone.
My thoughts on the matter have materialised from 25 years of thinking, reading, watching, debating, and even university study. What more can I say?
One of my primary arguments is that all 'evidence' (the kind you're talking about, at least), is experiential/observed.
You cannot, SAM, undermine the notion that the whole universe is nothing other than an experience upon the basis of experiential evidence.
I can talk about this forever and have talked about it at-length many times over the years, but that's the bottom-line:
You have NO evidence which undermines my philosophy.
Nobody does. Nobody can.
I can't disprove Russell's teapot either. Why would I even try? Generating an untestable position isn't an accomplishment, and it certainly doesn't make your position true.
Whoa. In your previous post you implied you had "evidence" to undermine my philosophy. One post later you're admitting that you have no evidence at all. Make your fuckin' mind up.
