Posted: Jun 24, 2010 12:54 pm
Mr P wrote:mindyourmind wrote:Nothing?
Give us chance, it's a bloody long article
He's detailed, very eloquently, one of my major irritations when confronted by the "science doesn't know everything" crowd. Thanks to this I now have a way to counter the accusations of closed mindedness I occasionally have thrown at me.
EDIT: I particularly like the demolition job he does on Mc Grath, I made the mistake of reading Finding Dawkins God which left me with a headache.
Sorry to make fun about your slow reading
Yes, I think it is an important article, one that neatly gathers together much of what I have felt in arguing against the Credulous.