Posted: Oct 07, 2010 11:25 pm
Paul Almond wrote:LIFE wrote:I expected you to say so but wouldn't it be more expedient to try and avoid ambiguities?
Instead of absolute certainty say fully convinced? Added equivocation obfuscates otherwise transparent communication, no? I say this because I myself often struggle to identify the intented meaning of the communicator's proposition.
Well, can you prove I typed any of that stuff?
No, since you clarified what you mean when you say "I know there is no god". Without clarification one could think that he who says "I know there is no god" is deluded if we take "to know" for "to know with absolute certainty" which prerequires the knowledge of the entire universe.